Consent, harm recognition, and help-seeking
Consent challenges, harm recognition, and barriers to help-seeking.
-
Join our panel discussion and online launch of the guidance, 2 November.Sign up
-
Experiences of harm associated with rough sex are often complex.
Confusion and uncertainty about consent, difficulties acknowledging or articulating harmful experiences, and broader sociocultural influences that reinforce rough sex as expected, accepted, or pleasurable can all act as barriers to recognising harm and seeking help.
Understanding these complexities can help practitioners recognise when harm may be present, respond in ways that validate young people's experiences, support their hauora, and reduce the risk of ongoing harm.
-
-
Consent challenges
-
Consent in the context of rough sex is often complex. While, in principle, consenting to rough sex should prevent harm, young people report that in practice, harmful rough sex experiences are often accompanied by confusion and uncertainty about consent.
Even where varying forms of consent are given, a young person can feel that rough sex was not safe, wanted, or freely chosen.
For example, when:
Consent is given for sex – and one partner assumes this implies consent for rough sex, despite the other partner not wanting or expecting it
Consent is given for rough sex – but partners have different understandings of what constitutes rough sex, and/or don’t discuss specific acts, limits, or intensity. This can result in acts that are unexpected, unwanted, or harmful
Consent is given for rough sex – but it becomes painful, frightening, or distressing, and a partner feels too afraid, "prude/vanilla" or ashamed to withdraw
Consenting to rough sex should also be understood within the context of contemporary youth sexual culture and through the lens of "social coercion".
Young people may engage in rough sex without explicit pressure yet still be influenced by dominant sociocultural norms. As rough sex is increasingly reinforced as "normal", "pleasurable" and "acceptable", young people may feel pressure to engage, limiting their perceived sense of choice or ability to negotiate rough sex even when it isn’t wanted or enjoyed. As a result, they may consent to rough sex, while still experiencing it as unwanted, harmful, or distressing.
-
-
Harm recognition
-
Some young people may minimise or normalise harmful rough sex experiences, or struggle to recognise or articulate harm – particularly when rough sex is perceived as normal, expected, or desirable, or when some form of consent was given.
Acknowledging a harmful experience may also occur at a later time, through reflection, conversations with peers or counsellors, or if trauma responses such as fear, distress, or triggering emerge.
Scripts impacting harm recognition
-
"It's my fault – I'm too vanilla" (When blame is internalised due to sexual norms).
"Well, I consented to sex" (When specific consent for rough sex isn't perceived to be needed).
“This is just what people do” (When rough sex is perceived as normal or expected).
“He said this is what’s normal and if I loved him, I’d do it” (When sexual coercion occurs within the relationship).
“How did I find myself here?” (When rough sex “just happens” without communication).
“I wasn’t clear enough about what I did or didn’t want” (When boundaries or unwanted acts aren’t discussed).
“That’s just what queer sex is now” “I went to the sauna for sex, so it’s my fault” (When rough sex is linked to harmful stereotypes).
“I can’t quite remember how this happened, and can’t tell anyone because of the drugs” (when rough sex occurs alongside sexual pleasure enhancing substances).
“It’s my fault – I didn’t say no” (When consent is perceived as “not resisting” or “going along” with sex).
“They would never harm me on purpose” (When rough sex occurs in an established relationship).
-
-
Barriers to help-seeking
-
Confusion around consent and difficulties recognising harm can make disclosure and help-seeking more difficult following harmful rough sex. There may also be additional barriers related to a young person’s circumstances, relationships, and social context.
For example:
When rough sex occurs within an established sexual relationship
Young people may minimise their experiences, have difficulty acknowledging harm, or be reluctant to disclose concerns because it occurred with a trusted partner.
Increased vulnerability to coercion or additional communication barriers
Some young people with adverse childhood experiences, autism, disabilities, or additional support needs may be more vulnerable to coercion and/or face additional challenges communicating or seeking help for harmful rough sex experiences.
When harmful rough sex occurs among takatāpui and rainbow people
Rainbow young people may already experience stigma or judgement relating to their sexuality or gender, which can create additional barriers to disclosure. Some may also believe their experiences do not fit legal, societal, or stereotypical understandings of sexual violence or that they won’t be taken seriously. Sexual violence between women can also be minimised due to misconceptions that violence between women is less harmful. Together, these factors can contribute to fears of further judgement and discrimination, making help-seeking for harmful rough sex difficult.
Understanding these barriers and creating safe, non-judgemental, and validating spaces can help influence whether a young person recognises harm and feels able to seek support.
-
-
-
-
Next: Effective engagementNext page